Final Project
by
Max Hodgen
April 25, 2010
LT 716
Contents
Project
Proposal Pages
3 – 5
Design
Document Pages
6 – 9
Production
Document Pages
10 – 12
Develop and
Deliver Document Page 13 – 14
Appendix Pages
15 – 16
Reflective Journal Pages
17 – 20
Project Proposal
Introduction
The Madison
Central school district strives to educate all students to fully achieve their
personal and academic potential as lifelong learners skilled in communication,
problem solving, and global responsibility.
In an effort to maximize the academic potential of our students, it is
important to align Madison Central’s math curriculum with the state content
standards. I see the potential to
strengthen our math curriculum by identifying gaps in instruction throughout
the district. Furthermore, I believe it is only a matter of time before the
Federal Government’s present proposal of mandating common core standards across
the nation becomes a reality.
A valuable
assessment tool, Achievement Series, can be utilized to review the scope and
sequence of our math curriculum k-12; identifying the strengths and gaps in
learning within the instruction. By
identifying learning gaps, we could effectively map out our math curriculum;
assuring alignment with the state content standards and better fulfilling the
mission of our district. I propose
devoting four, two hour blocks of the district’s in-service time to training
the instructors of the math department on how to incorporate Achievement Series
as part of their formal assessments.
As a high
school math instructor at Madison Central I believe that we owe it to our
students to investigate the scope and sequence of our math curriculum district
wide. Achievement Series is a great
starting point in the review process; it will provide meaningful data that is
compiled for easy evaluation. The
following proposal contains: the project definition, schedule and budget, and
qualifications.
Project Definition
The project
goal is to train all of Madison Central’s math teachers to use Achievement
Series as part of their formal assessments in class. The use of Achievement Series will allow the
district to gather and compile data for every student relative to their
academic performance in mathematics.
This data can thus serve as the starting point for a larger goal of the
district; which is aligning its math curriculum to the South Dakota content
standards. Achievement Series is a great
choice for our district because it is provide free by the state and all of the
assessments are codified according to the South Dakota content standards. The audience for instruction would include
every math instructor in the district. Most are technically proficient and
appear to have a willingness to learn and use new technologies.
The
instruction will focus on four outcomes:
1. Create classes and input students
into Achievement Series.
2. To create, edit, and share tests
from the provided test bank of content standards.
3. To input questions from outside
resources such as Exam View.
4. How to analyze the compiled data.
The final instructional product will
consist of training sessions and tutorials of how to implement Achievement
Series into the classroom. The training
sessions consist of four two hour work-shops conducted during in-services
throughout the upcoming year. Learners
will be guided in a face-to-face setting by an instructor on meeting the four
outcomes stated above. Learners will be
encouraged to bring in relevant content so their creations can be implemented
and then further reviewed during subsequent training sessions (#4). PowerPoint or OneNote will be utilized by the
instructor during the group in-services.
The second component will consist of a OneNote tutorial that will be
placed on the districts share drive. The
OneNote notebook can be divided into four sections covering the previously
state outcomes, and the sections can then be divided into pages highlighting
specific steps. This tutorial will
provide learners a valuable resource if they get stuck on their own.
Schedule and Budget
Timeline
March 20 Proposal Submitted
March 27 Objectives submitted for review
April 2 Activities and Assessments submitted for review
April 9 OneNote Tutorial submitted for review
April 16 Complete revisions to the activities, assessments, and
tutorial
April 23 Pilot Test
April 30 Complete final revisions
May 7 Deliver final product
Cost
The Madison
Central school district pays $16.80/hr for curriculum development conducted
outside regular school operating hours.
Since the service of Achievement Series is provided free and all other
necessary equipment/software is already provide by the district the only costs
for this project would include: the development of the instructional product
and the delivery of instruction. I
estimate a total of 20 hours developing the product and eight hours of provide
instruction, resulting in a total cost of $470.40.
Assumptions
To
accomplish the goal of gathering data from students, the instructors participating
must buy into the instruction. The
administration must reiterate the importance of aligning the curriculum with
the content standards and that the first step in that process in gathering data
using Achievement Series. If we wish to
effectively map our curriculum we need up-to-date data reflecting the
achievement of students in every grade.
Finally, it is assumed that the Department of Education will continue to
fund Achievement Series for South Dakota public schools.
Qualifications
I have a
B.S. in Technology Management, a B.S. in Physics, and am currently working on a
M.S. in Educational Technology. I have
been teaching high school mathematics and science for the past 11 years. For the past four years I have been using
Achievement Series in the classroom and have presented the benefits of
incorporating it into educator’s assessments at multiple forums throughout the
state.
Design Document
Executive Summary
One
component of Madison Central’s mission is to educate all students to fully
achieve their academic potential. This
instructional workshop will devote four, two hour blocks of the district’s
in-service time to training the instructors of the math department on how to
incorporate Achievement Series as part of their formal assessments. The Achievement Series workshop will enable
the math educators in Madison Central’s school district to gather data on the
academic performance of its students in mathematics. This data can then be used to guide the
administration to better align the districts mathematics curricula with the
South Dakota content standards. The
project goal of educating math instructors to utilize Achievement Series in
their classrooms for assessments is in essences the initial process of a larger
goal for the district.
Each
training session will progress in a linear fashion requiring the participants
to develop assessments specific to their classrooms. Each successive workshop in the training will
allow participants an opportunity to present their finished products to the
group. Learners in the workshop will be
actively engaged throughout the process.
The key deliverables of the instruction will be demonstrated using
OneNote. The learners will be guided
through a step-by-step process on how to meet the objectives of the training,
which are outlined below. They will be
provided a two week time span between the subsequent training sessions to apply
the training in their classroom.
Learning need/market opportunity
Achievement Series is a web based assessment tool provided
free to all South Dakota public schools.
Schools opting to use Achievement Series are provided with a site
identification number and user passwords for each individual educator and
student. The assessment questions were
developed by a collection of educators throughout the state and classified
according to the content standards.
Additional questions can be imported into Achievement Series by the
educator on their own or through supplemental materials such as Exam View.
Using Achievement
Series can help assist curriculum designers in an effort to better fulfill the
district’s mission. Currently, as a
district we are struggling to identify gaps in learning. Mapping the scope and sequence of our math
curriculum has been a difficult task in the past. Most attempts were met with resistance and a
defensive position by those educators who felt there wasn’t any real data to support
the claims that gaps or weakness in instruction existed. Using Achievement Series will provide the
metrics to support change and paint a clearer picture of our math
curriculum. To fully reap the benefits
of Achievement Series, educators must be trained on how to implement it into
their assessments.
Instructional goals
Teachers who complete the instructional training will be able
to create classes, and develop and administer assessments using Achievement
Series. Teachers will also learn how to
navigate the tutorial when working on their own. The Madison Central school district will be
provided with increased statistical measures that can guide them in the review
process of curriculum development.
Audience definition
Every math instructor in the Madison Central school district
will be required to complete the instructional training. The instructor’s ages range between 25 and 55
years old. All have a minimum of a
bachelor’s degree and are proficient at using computers. It is expected that most will be interested
in the training, however, it is possible to experience resistance by some of
the veteran instructors. It has been my
experience in attending and training during workshops that there is less
excitement among some veteran teachers about learning new technologies. Most educators above the age of 40 were not
trained with the technologies of today.
This resistance can be overcome if the learners realize the
importance of the training and see the big picture. It is important for the trainer to create a
learning environment where the learner feels comfortable about asking for
help. Another strategy to employ when
teaching a step by step process on the computer is to partner up a weaker
student with a stronger one.
Delivery environment
The initial instruction will be delivered synchronously in a
classroom environment lead by an instructor.
The classroom setting is divided into four, two hour blocks spread out
over a two month period. Learners will
be required to bring their computers.
All computers will require an Internet Explorer browser to access
Achievement Series. All learners will be
provided with a site identification and login password that is unique for all
Madison Central users. A tutorial
detailing all the activities completed throughout the instruction will be
placed on the district’s share drive.
The learners can expect to spend between 4-8 hours to complete the
training.
General outcomes
1. Create classes and input students into Achievement Series.
2. To create, edit, and share tests from the provided test
bank of content standards.
3. To input questions from outside resources such as Exam
View.
4. How to analyze the compiled data.
Assessment strategies
The instructional product and tutorial will be four sections
in OneNote covering each outcome. Each
training session will address one outcome.
Learners will demonstrate mastery of the day’s outcome by developing a
finished product they can use in their classroom. Presentations from participates can then be
shared with the entire group during the following training sessions. The instructional product will provide
instruction and time for the learners to develop assessments in Achievement
Series. The effectiveness of the
instructional product will be assessed through a small-test group in which
participants will complete an attitude survey (Appendix A1). Further evaluations on the small test-group
will be completed by the instructor of the group.
Content organization
-What is Achievement Series?
-Review formative and summative assessments.
-An overview of the scope and sequence of our math curriculum
district wide.
-Inputting learners
-Developing and sharing tests
-Examining statistical measures provided by Achievement
Series.
Content sources
The content
will be provided by the designer (me). I
have used Achievement Series for the past five years as part of my
assessments. I will be able access past
tests and data to gather content for each outcome. Through experience I understand what works
well and what doesn’t. The types of
questions need to be: multiple choice, T/F, or matching. It is advisable to only use questions that
can be viewed without causing the student to scroll up and down. This pertains to many of the graphing
questions that need to be altered. It is
also wise to set wider parameters on grade ranges so the designer can select
from a larger bank of questions.
Finally, set up your courses as individual classes instead of one large
class for easier administration and organization.
Instructional strategies
The
instructional strategy will be step-by-step demonstrations, followed by
practice and feedback. Learners
experience greater success when implementing new technologies, when they have
the ability to work with the product and receive immediate feedback when
roadblocks occur. In my opinion,
providing instructors with guidance and time in developing meaning content for
their own instruction is the best instructional strategy for meeting the
previously state goal.
Standards
The question
bank within Achievement Series was developed by educators and organized in a
fashion that reflects the content standards for South Dakota. For a complete review of South Dakota’s
mathematics content standards go to: http://doe.sd.gov/contentstandards/math/docs/MathStandards--Approved05-17-04.pdf
Questions
downloaded from most text book providers can be utilized in Achievement Series
and are organized based on the National Council of Teachers in
Mathematics. The website below is an
overview of the national standards for mathematics provide by NCTM: http://standards.nctm.org/document/chapter3/index.htm
Media
The
step-by-step demonstrations and tutorial will be presented using OneNote. OneNote
allows the user to easily organize the content, input or paste pictures, and
utilizes the function of the stylist.
Actual images of Achievement Series’ website will be used to during the
demonstrations.
Evaluation and testing plans
A small
pilot test of three educators will be selected to participate in the testing of
the first outcome upon completion. Any
identified problems relative to usability, length of instruction, and
assessment will be correct and aid in making applicable revisions for further
instruction.
Production Document
Treatment
Content Chunk Treatment
1. Introduction -Section 1, Pages 1-3
-Express
goals / Shared vision
-Overview
of current practices & previous experiences
-Description
of Achievement Series
2. Objectives -Objectives appear in a bullet list in
Sections 2, 3, 4 on page 1
3. Demonstrate (Gain -Explain the steps necessary to:
& Integrate Content)
-Setup a class, Section 1
-Develop tests, Section2
-Share and
incorporate supplemental materials, Section 3
-Images, screen clip
from Achievement Series
4. Practice (Take Action -Learners Login
& Monitor Progress) -Create
Tests
-Check for
understanding
-Provide
Feedback
-Actual
administration of their test
5. Shared Experiences -Learners reflect on
successes & failures with the product,
(Synthesize & Evaluate
Sections 3 & 4
Knowledge) -Specific
feedback to reflections
6. Data Analysis -Explain how to access
and interpret data, Section 4
(Extend & Transfer)
User
scenario
The learner is presented the content
through guided demonstrations from an instructor. The content and step by step instructions can
then be accessed by the learner from the share drive or copied to the learner’s
computer. Next, the learner will log
into Achievement Series and begin to create a course and add users (students). This process is the most time consuming
component of the instruction. Therefore,
the learner is provided support and feedback from the instructor while being
reassured that subsequent activities will go much quicker.
Once the learner has created a course,
she/he will move onto creating assessments.
The learner is encouraged to bring in some of her/his own classroom
content in an effort to develop her next classroom assessment. The learner identifies the objectives and
standards for her next module of classroom instruction and then selects those
standards within the Achievement Series test bank. Finally, the learner selects the questions
she wants and saves the test.
The learner is provided instruction on
how to administer the assessment to her students. Since the assessment is online and new,
possible obstacles students face are addressed with the learner. Upon administering the assessment, follow-up
training sessions will allow the learner to share his/her experiences with the
group and progress to more advanced topics within Achievement Series.
Template
All step by step instruction provided in
OneNote will follow a template. The
template will identify the activity, list required steps, and then provide a
visual through a screen clipping. Black
text, Times New Roman size 12 font will be used on a white background. All heading will be bold and size 14. All ink comments placed on screen clippings
will be done in blue. Only one activity
will be place on a page.
Requirement
specifications
Internet connection
Web Browser - Netscape navigator or
Microsoft Internet Explorer
Microsoft Windows OS with OneNote
software
Description
of media assets needed
Achievement Series web pages – free to
all public school districts
Screen Clippings of Achievement Series –
provided by designer
Tutorial – provided by designer
Discussion board Wiki – free to
educators developed by the designer
Storyboard
– Outline
Achievement Series Notebook
I. Section 1 – Creating classes
Pages:
1.
Goals
2.
Shared Vision
3.
Define
4.
Login
5.
Create Courses
6.
Five Steps
II. Section 2 – Creating Tests
Pages:
1.
Classroom
2.
Normal Test
3.
Step 1
4.
Step 2
5.
Step 3
6.
Step 4
7.
Selecting Grade Level Standards
8.
Selecting Specific Standards
9.
Selecting Questions
10.
Finished
III. Section 3 – Sharing Tests
Pages:
1.
Sharing Tests
2.
Select Test
3.
Copy
IV. Section 4 – Data Analysis
Pages:
1.
Results
2.
Standards
3.
Item Analysis
4.
District Reports
Below is clip of how the sections and
pages are organized within OneNote.
Prototype
A working prototype can be found on
pages 4-6 in section 1. The instruction
details the login process, creating courses, and adding students. The prototype is attached as PDF.
Develop & Deliver Document
Complete
the development of the instructional materials.
I converted the instructional materials
in OneNote over to a PDF to allow easy transfer of the documents. Each tab in the PDF represents a section of
the instructional materials. It is
attached with this document.
Small-Group
Test
A small–group test will be conducted
with three of my colleagues covering the first section of the instruction. The three test subjects will have had limited
exposure to Achievement Series. The
group test will run for two hours and finish up with the subjects completing an
Attitude Questionnaire (Appendix – A1). The group test instruction will be delivered
in a classroom setting with the content presented in OneNote on an overhead
projector.
Formative Evaluation Results
The small-group test involved three
elementary Madison Central mathematics educators. The three educators had never used
Achievement Series before. They were all
proficient with working with computers, as they have all been using a Gateway
285 Tablet for the past four years in their classrooms. All the teachers have at least seven years of
teaching experience.
The small-group questionnaire revealed
many positive aspects about the workshop and provided valuable information for
making minor revisions. The results
showed that the content was easy to read on the projector and was present in a
linear method that made creating classes easy for them. All three of the test subjects stated they
enjoyed a workshop that actually allocates time for them to develop classroom
materials while being guided by an expert.
Finally, they all felt confident that they could perform the task of
creating classes and adding/editing students on their own.
The educators did express that creating
classes and adding students was a tedious task, confirming our initial thoughts
concerning this chunk of instruction.
One suggested that breaking this task into two different one hour blocks
might be more beneficial. Another
suggestion was to create some type of discussion board for learners to exchange
ideas and trouble shoot problem areas.
Deliver
instructional materials and results of the formative evaluation to your client.
I converted the instructional materials
to a PDF, since OneNote can be difficult for new users to navigate and
problematic to transfer through email.
This PDF once checked for grammatical errors and typos would be sent to
Madison Central’s superintendent along with the formative evaluation from
above. I would then set up a meeting
with the superintendent discussing the final project and hopefully selecting
dates for utilizing in-service opportunities.
Gather
feedback on your performance throughout the design process in a post project
debriefing meeting.
Madison Central’s administration will be
asked to complete the post project evaluation.
In a perfect scenario the instruction would take place during the
summer, allowing the learners the school year to put into effect their
training. The post evaluation will
consist of survey completed by the superintendent and then a review of the data
accessed through Achievement Series at the end of the year (Appendix – A2). A true success would be that 100% of the
learners utilized Achievement Series to administer at least four assessments to
their students.
At the end of the year a debriefing
meeting would be scheduled with the administration, designer (me), and few
participants of the workshop to discuss lessons learned. The meeting would allow the group to discuss
what worked well with the instruction and what changes could be made to improve
the program.
Calculate
a cost analysis and cost-per-student index for your materials.
The designer (me) spent fifteen hours
organizing and developing the OneNote presentation. At a rate $16.80/hr the total is $252. Achievement Series is a free service provided
to all South Dakota public schools. All
materials required for the instructional workshop, such as computers and overhead
will be provide free by the school district.
The only other cost the district would incur would be the rate at which
they decide to pay their employees for attending the workshop. If the district chooses to use some of it’s
built in in-service days for all the mathematics instructors to attend the
workshop then no addition costs would be realized.
Appendix – A1
Small-Group Questionnaire
1. The OneNote presentation of the
content was easy to view on the overhead
projector.
______ No
______ Yes |
2. Was the content easy to follow?
______ No ______ Yes |
3. How would you rate the length of
instruction?
______ Too short
______ Too long ______ Appropriate |
4. How confident are you that you can
create classes on your own?
_______Very
_______ Somewhat _______ Not |
5. This
workshop could be improved by: |
Appendix – A2
Post Project Client
Evaluation Form
Please circle one: 1 is the lowest, 5 is
the highest
1. Overall, how would you rate our performance? |
1 2 3 4 5 |
2. Did we meet the project goals? |
1 2 3 4 5 |
3. Did we follow the budget? |
1 2 3 4 5 |
4. Did we meet our timelines? |
1 2 3 4 5 |
5. Are your employees utilizing the instruction? |
1 2 3 4 5 |
6. What did you like about the product? |
|
7. What didn’t you like? |
|
8. Additional Comments: |
|
Reflective Journal
Chapter 8
I was anticipating something completely different when I
started thinking about the define phase.
I never considered the aspect of drafting a proposal with the hopes of
landing the design project. Chapter
eight presented a good overview of how to research, organize, and present
proposals. It highlighted for me that
the success of a designer’s company hinges on its ability to draft proposals
that stand out from its competition. I
am curious as to the number of proposals an instructional design company has
going on simultaneously and how they respond if multiple proposals are
accepted.
I decided to create an instructional product about how to use
Achievement Series. It provides useful
data and was easy for me to learn. I
really think if our teachers would use it our district could solve some of its
curriculum issues. On my proposal I
struggled a bit trying to convey the goal of the project because the goal is
really a component of a larger issue. I hope that by identifying multiple
issues I have not confused the readers.
Time spent on the define stage:
3/15 4:00 to 6:00 pm
3/16 4:00 to 6:00 pm
3/19 8:00 to 11:00
am
Comments:
Wow! This has very professional feel in tone, both
in setup and vocabulary. I have no
additions, only to say that I wish I would have seem yours before submitting
mine! I am vaguely familiar with OneNote, but Achievement Series is used
heavily where I work and it seems to be a great program! Nice work!
(Do you have in-service dates?)
How
many Math instructors are there?
Well
done!
Chapter 9
I thought I did ok with this section but I received the worst
grade out of the four documents on this one.
I didn’t realize the detail you were looking for. I was kind of afraid of being
repetitive. I hoped I cleared up some of
the confusion surrounding the project goal and how it is part of a larger goal
for the district. I also had a hard time
conveying the obstacles the instruction might have on training veteran
teachers. I couldn’t find any documentation
or studies to validate my assumptions but my direct experiences with a few of
my peers lead me to believe there will be some resistance.
Time spent
March 22 10:00 am
to 2:00 pm
March 23 5:00 pm
to 7:30 pm
March 24 4:00 to
6:00 pm
Comments
I was SO confused about what this
section was. I copied your idea for mineJ Thanks!
Looks good! I had a hard time figuring out the difference
between some sections on mine, but yours seems very clear. I caught a few typo things, but remember I am
an art teacher so grammar is not a strong point. I especially enjoyed the notation on resistance
from more experienced staff members.
Oh, and might want to take the
Name__________________ off the topJ
My understanding for this section is
that they are not looking at the content standards K-12 students. They are looking at what standards are out
there that the instructional designers must follow. One of the examples in the book talks about
creating materials in which the learner must use either APA or MLA format as
the standard when talking about citing sources.
In my paper, I used the W3 Consortiums standards as the standards to
follow when dealing with accessibility when creating a website.
(Maybe you could describe what
OneNote is.)
Great Job! This sounds interesting!
Chapter 10
This portion of the design process was the most difficult for me. I didn’t fully grasp the difference between the paper prototype and the actually prototype. I also had a lot of difficulty transferring my instructional materials through email. Sending OneNote files is challenging. You have to send the whole notebook and all I wanted to send was a couple of pages to represent the prototype. Next, OneNote is specific software to those who use tablets, so many user don’t even have it. I decided to use Journal, but wasn’t happy with transferring three additional attachments. I think using a PDF is the way to go but I need to work with that. I am planning on playing around with Adobe to see if I can copy and organize my sections. I did create a Wiki to put all the files on, but it just doesn’t look that good. The attachments are way at the bottom of the page-I don’t think user will be able to find it. I am considering using the site for a discussion board for the learners though.
Time Spent
March 29th 4:00 to 6:00
March 30th 4:00 to 6:00
April 1st 5:00 to 8:00
April 2nd 11:00 to 12:00
Comments
Treatment
-(Very
organized and well done!)
After
completing my document and then taking a look at yours, I don't see anything at
first glance that needs to be changed on yours. I was worried if I was
doing the right things to complete my document but feel comfortable that I was
on the right track after looking at yours.
I
think it looks fine. I, too, did mine like yours, with a portion of it done and
the rest laid out to be completed later. I hope that is acceptable to the
professor. The others had scripts. I don't have anything to attach
because I didn't see any changes.
Chapter 11
Well after
looking at the feedback from my group members, my initial concerns about
transferring the learning content were confirmed. Thankfully, this week I was able to play
around with Adobe and organize the learning content into one file that I could
attach and transfer through email.
Time Spent
April 5th 4:00 to 6:00
April 6th 4:00 to 6:00
April 7th 3:00 to 4:30
April 9th 11:00 to 12:00
Comments:
This
was easier to open, Thank you! Your work
is very crisp, clear, and easy to follow.
The graphics add a lot as well!
This
was a hard section to envision without doing.
The questionnaire is a logical choice.
Good:) It is funny to read knowing that most of us
did not actually do this :)
Might
want to add some sort of thank you.
(Could
include a comment section for questions 1 and 2 ..?)
Move
this to the top of the eval form)
This
looks very good. I did find a couple of
typos but other than that I am not sure that there is anything else that needs
to be changed.